Skip to main content

Interesting Failures

Here's a real news flash: yet another day of mysterious failures. On our last attempt, we were pretty successful, perhaps the closest we've ever been. However, we didn't really know which negative we were using since we pulled it out of a pile of old negatives that, of course, have not been labeled with any useful information like which curve had been applied to it or what printer settings was used to print it. And even though it was winter, it was still a clear day with direct sun which made our exposure time 18 minutes.

But this time, it was thick overcast sky and it had been raining the past few days so it was just more moisture in the air. We got the printer working but we had forgotten the exact combination of printer settings that we had used in the past.

We used the knowledge of the vast internet to ask how does the amount of uv light compare on a cloudy day versus a sunny day. We found mixed answers, so supposedly it can be anywhere from 70 to 90% less uv on a cloudy day. What do these numbers mean for our exposure time? 18 minutes worked well on a clear day, therefore 70-90% less uv would make our new exposure anywhere from 1-3 hours. That's really helpful.

We set the coated paper and negative in the contact frame and found a strategic location for it to sit out in the direct cloudy light, which happened to be on some stairs that no one uses, like emergency stairs or service stairs. We set it to the side of the stairs just in case some person walked up them, which didn't seem likely since no one ever uses those stairs. Set our timer for an hour and left it. when we returned we found that someone had moved our contact frame! What's up with that? Who knows how far into the hour was it when it was moved? And who ever moved it was careless and the negative shifted on the paper. And as if that wasn't bad enough, the increased moisture in the air made some kind of chemical reaction in the negative plastic material and it turns all foggy and white. Not a good thing.

Is success anywhere on the horizon? So it was yet another day of failures, but thanks to our mystery mover, it was an interesting failure, at the very least. Our conclusion? Just say "no" to cyanotypes on cloudy days.


Popular posts from this blog

Epson 3800 of doom and despair

It's hopeless. Printers hate us. Our promised savior, the Epson 3800, has clogged print heads. We've soaked them in Ammonia Windex, we purchased special stuff to squirt through the darn ultra-tiny nozzles. We've run endless ink-wasting cleaning cycles. Alas: still clogged. Perhaps we will learn to love the lines through our prints, as if they are retro-cool TV scan lines. Perhaps not. If you are reading this, please consider sending us lots and lots of money for a new printer. Thank you for your support. Paypal accepted.

Yellow stain on cyanotypes. Problem solved!

At last, a problem with a solution. When we first started coating paper with our own cyanotype chemistry we were getting bad yellow stains. It turns out there are two ways to combat the ugly yellow. One is to add citric acid to to the first water bath when developing the print. The easier way is to add a bit to the sensitizer chemistry itself. We'd done that, but it turned out we hadn't been adding enough. So now, the yellow you see in the above print is a thing of the past. One problem solved, eight zillion to go.

Hello Cyanotype, meet Hydrogen Peroxide

You've exposed your cyanotype print and it just looks weird. You put it in a tray of water, and it looks better after a while, but still not all that wonderful. You dry it and wait three days for it to oxidize, or you could do something really fun: drop it into a tray of water with a little hydrogen peroxide. Be sure so say "Bam!"